ANALYSING OF
USING SLOGAN “DON’T STOP KOMANDAN” IN POLITICAL PARTY
(A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS)
A.
Background
Lack of knowledge is one of problems concerned about foreign
language in use. The layman is difficult to receive the terms which cannot be
understood. In other words, the using language is difficult to understand. In
this case, it shows that lack of knowledge can be illustrated from someone’s
capability understanding in using language.
Afterwards, the level of regard to pay attention in using foreign
language in society is also missing. In this case, can be illustrated from lack
of proclivity everyone to study in language. Language is only as community
priority. So sometimes there are misapprehensions.
The most of people was ever in misinterpreting something. Misinterpretation
exactly had been around by educator. Error in misinterpretation is happened
when using words or ambiguous sentences. In this case, it is not understood by the
layman. For example in using sentences in foreign language which is sometimes
make a mistaken. Whereas using of foreign language is glowing to use in
multiple place. For instance slogan, instance, market and so on.
All of the problem which has expressed above can be caused by two
cases. The first is foreign language as a western issue. This issue had
spread in central society. Indeed all of the society in the village. Foreign
language as western issue can be demonstrated by many people. They used foreign
language as the impressive language although is not suitable with grammatical
in use. For example using of foreign language in the slogan to convoy in
demonstrates their aspiration.
The second is foreign
language as an interested language. An interesting someone to use foreign
language can be proved by how do someone use code-mixing between the first
language and the second language. So what they mention through orally and
writing becomes contradiction to society itself.
In addition, Indonesia is one of the biggest Democratic Party. It
is pointed that glowing of political party arises in many situates. It can
cause wrongness. It is not show as a good language. Slogan is familiar to
convoy the conspiracy. So the politicians acquire a gold chance to aspirate
their recommend to write the motto or symbol as they believe in their
community.
Misinterpretation happened by three things. The first knows
only just one language. They only know
just one language. So it is difficult to understand the new languages that come
in their mind. Basically, many people just used one language because they are
rarely to find out someone to communicate. Whereas they are need the new
information about language.
The second is creating
misunderstanding. Communication can make someone happy if they can keep their
statement. In this case,
misunderstanding was often come about by someone who has made mistaken in
language use. It showed that people difficult to receive foreign language as
the symbol of political party. In fact, many people just using in utterance but
don’t know the real meaning of the language.
The third is unconfident
to use official language. Official language is the agreement of many people to
use language at the country. The language user in political party is not confident
to use their official language. They used multiple language to convoy their
conspiracy. Indeed the language sometime is not suitable with the context.
Finally in this research, the writer gives some solutions can
minimize about some of problems above. The politicians need to use official
language. The society is more believe if the politicians use official language
to indicate that it is own language. Afterwards, it gives a pride of
nationalism. And then the politicians need to use convoy their conspiracy
orally. It showed that many people consider the using language by doing than
just writing about foreign language in the slogan which is an ambiguous
meaning.
B.
Problem statement
·
Why
many of politicians used foreign language to convoy in their conspiracy?
·
What
is the motivation of politicians in using “Don’t Stop Komandan” in their
conspiracy?
